Programm                 "Degeneration und Regeneration– Grundlagen, Diagnostik und Therapie"


Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Ablauf der Tagung 2003
   General overview of congress
Lageplan der Räumlichkeiten
   Map of Congress Center
Wissenschaftliche Themen
   Scientific topics
Symposien
   Symposia
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Accompanying program
Arbeitssitzungen
   Working sessions
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Industrieaussteller
   Commercial exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Impressum



DOG Homepage


Abstract
Abstract

Corneal Trephine Systems - a Historical Survey

Tost F.
Centre of Ophthalmology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald

Complex advances in modern transplantation medicine have solved decisive problems of the grafting of ocular tissue from donors to recipient. A critical precondition for any successful transfer is the skill of excising the recipient and donor tissues. The quality of the excision clearly determines the healing of the transplant and thus the patient's visual acuity. Basically, the development of the skill with which the excision is made is as old the idea of keratoplasty. The initial idea was probably proposed by Erasmus Darwin. In `Zoonomia`, published in 1797, he suggested that a little piece of cornea could be cut out by means of a kind of trephine maybe the size of a raven's feather. In the early 19th century, this idea was picked up by Dieffenbach and Koenigshöfer. The early surgeons used semicircular knives or double knives carrying out parallel cuts, such as were presented by Strauch in 1840 and Marcus in 1841. However, these tools did not produce a continuous smooth cut. The corneal trephines developed by Bowman and Wecker were much better in this respect, in 1872. However, the use of the trephine required a lot of experience as, depending on the texture of the tissue, different pressure had to be applied to the cornea. Major technical problems of the cutting procedure were only solved satisfactorily by v. Hippel`s motorized trephine. Unlike similar tools common at that time, the motorized trephine used a precision clockwork and a fast, uniform rotation of the trep


Zurück | Back